From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Mirage Casino Hotel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 2:1 l-cv-01278-GMN-R.U (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:1 l-cv-01278-GMN-R.U

10-17-2011

PAMELYA M. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. THE MIRAGE CASINO HOTEL, a Nevada Corporation; TREASURE ISLAND, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; LINDA KANATA, an individual; and RICHARD AMALFITANO, an individual; Doe Individuals 1-10 and Roe Entities 1-10, Defendants.

BRUCE C. YOUNG, ESQ., Bar #5560 AITHYNI K. RUCKER, ESQ., Bar #10210 LITTLER MENDELSON Attorneys for Defendants TREASURE ISLAND, LLC, LINDA KANATA and RICHARD AMALFITANO BRUCE C. YOUNG, ESQ. AITHYNI K. RUCKER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON Attorneys for Defendants


BRUCE C. YOUNG, ESQ., Bar #5560

AITHYNI K. RUCKER, ESQ., Bar #10210

LITTLER MENDELSON

Attorneys for Defendants

TREASURE ISLAND, LLC, LINDA KANATA

and RICHARD AMALFITANO

DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO

EXCUSE INDIVIDUALLY-NAMED

DEFENDANTS FROM ATTENDANCE

AT ENE SESSION

COME NOW Defendants Treasure Island, LLC, Linda Kanata, and Richard Amalfitano, by and through their counsel, Littler Mendelson, and hereby request the Court to allow individual Defendants Linda Kanata and Richard Amalfitano to be excused from attending the ENE session scheduled for October 21, 2007.

plaintiff's only claim brought against Defendants Kanata and Amalfitano is the Eleventh Cause of Action alleging a claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Defendants filed a Partial Motion to Dismiss on August 15, 2011, seeking dismissal with prejudice the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claim (as well as additional causes of action). The IIHD claim is clearly barred by the statute of limitations and will not survive dismissal. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is fully briefed for the Court, but has not been ruled on as of October 11, 2011.

Based on the fact that the IIED claim is barred by the statute of limitations, it is defendant Treasure Island's position that it not necessary to inconvenience Defendants Kanata and Amalfitano by requiring their attendance at the ENE conference. Further, Defendant Treasure Island's corporate representative will be personally present at the ENE conference and will have settlement authority to settle the action on behalf of the individually-named defendants as well as Treasure Island. Accordingly, Defendants respectfully request that Defendants Kanata and Amalfitano be excused from attendance at the ENE.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________

BRUCE C. YOUNG, ESQ.

AITHYNI K. RUCKER, ESQ.

LITTLER MENDELSON

Attorneys for Defendants

Peggy A. Leen

United States Magistrate Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am a resident of the State of Nevada, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the

within action. My business address is 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300, Las Vegas, Nevada 89169. On October 11, 2011,1 served the within document(s):


DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO EXCUSE INDIVIDUALLY-NAMED DEFENDANTS

FROM ATTENDANCE AT ENE SESSION
[x] By CM/ECF Filing - Pursuant to FRCP 5(b)(3) and LR 5-4, the above-referenced document
was electronically filed and served upon the parties listed below through the Court's Case
Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system:
Dan M. Winder, Esq.
3507 W. Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89102

I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing and for shipping via overnight delivery service. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service or if an overnight delivery service shipment, deposited in an overnight delivery service pick-up box or office on the same day with postage or fees thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 11, 2011, at Las Vegas, Nevada.

________________

Kimberly Gregbs


Summaries of

Anderson v. Mirage Casino Hotel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 2:1 l-cv-01278-GMN-R.U (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Anderson v. Mirage Casino Hotel

Case Details

Full title:PAMELYA M. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. THE MIRAGE CASINO HOTEL, a Nevada…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:1 l-cv-01278-GMN-R.U (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)