From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Maddocks

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01079-WDM-PAC (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01079-WDM-PAC.

July 10, 2006


ORDER


This is a pro se prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's Prisoner Complaint, tendered to the court on July 3, 2006, is STRICKEN, because it is identical to the Prisoner Complaint filed by plaintiff on June 7, 2006;

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis . . . (Doc. #10), filed July 3, 2006, is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis on June 19, 2006 (Doc. #5);

(3) Plaintiff's Motion to Have Defendants Served (Doc. #9), filed July 3, 2006, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: The court has ordered the United States Marshal to serve a summons and copy of the complaint on each defendant, at the government's expense, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). See June 29, 2006 Order Granting Service by United States Marshal (Doc. #8) However, plaintiff is obligated to serve copies of all other filings in this case on the defendants. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Maddocks

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01079-WDM-PAC (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Anderson v. Maddocks

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LAMER ANDERSON, Plaintiff(s), v. MARILYN MADDOCKS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 10, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01079-WDM-PAC (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2006)