From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. MacDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. SA CV 11-1248 VBF (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. SA CV 11-1248 VBF (JCG)

10-11-2011

EYAN RENDELL ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. JAMES E. MACDONALD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not shown that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether": (1) "the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right"; and (2) "the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

HON. VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Anderson v. MacDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. SA CV 11-1248 VBF (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Anderson v. MacDonald

Case Details

Full title:EYAN RENDELL ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. JAMES E. MACDONALD, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. SA CV 11-1248 VBF (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)