From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Longley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-283 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-283 Erie

10-10-2012

DURYLL ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. ARCHIE LONGLEY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on November 17, 2011 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9], filed on September 18, 2012, recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2012;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on September 18, 2012, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

The Clerk is directed to mark the case closed.

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge
cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Anderson v. Longley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-283 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Anderson v. Longley

Case Details

Full title:DURYLL ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. ARCHIE LONGLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-283 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2012)