Opinion
1:23CV111
03-30-2023
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. LEE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
LORETTA C. BIGGS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on March 13, 2023, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 4, 5.) Plaintiff submitted a filing which he labeled as an Objection, (see ECF No. 6), but said filing actually states that Plaintiff does not object to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (see id.). The Court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be filed and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 42 U.S.C. § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation.