From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01911-CMA-KMT (D. Colo. Jun. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01911-CMA-KMT

06-04-2012

KAREN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. a/k/a J.P. MORGAN CHASE AND COMPANY, its Known and Unknown Partners, Contractors, Subcontractors, Successors, Heirs and Assigns; DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED, its Known and Unknown Partners, Contractors, Subcontractors, Successors, Heirs and Assigns; ALL MAINTENANCE COMPANIES KNOWN AND UNKNOWN PARTNERS, CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, SUCCESSORS, HEIRS AND ASSIGNS; JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, WHOSE TRUE IDENTITIES ARE UNKNOWN, Defendants.


Judge Christine M. Arguello


ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. # 49), filed on June 4, 2012. The Complaint and the claims of the plaintiff asserted against the defendants in the above-captioned civil action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs, fees and expenses.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Anderson v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01911-CMA-KMT (D. Colo. Jun. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Anderson v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. a/k/a J.P. MORGAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 4, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01911-CMA-KMT (D. Colo. Jun. 4, 2012)