From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Shih

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 8, 2019
923 N.W.2d 286 (Mich. 2019)

Opinion

SC: 159085 COA: 344540

03-08-2019

Laveta ANDERSON and Charles J. Taunt, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jenny SHIH, D.O., Inocencio Cuesta, M.D., Malini Venkatram, M.D., Suchita Bheemreddy, M.D., University Physician Group, VHS Physicians of Michigan, Harper-Hutzel Hospital, Legacy HHH, VHS Harper-Hutzel, Inc., VHS of Michigan, Inc., Legacy DMC, Tenet Healthcare Corporation, Botsford General Hospital, and The Wellness Plan, Defendants, and Karthik Yadagiri, P.T., Rupa Patel, P.T., Theramatrix, Inc., d/b/a TheraMatrix Physical Rehabilitation, TheraMatrix Physical Rehabilitation, TheraMatrix Physical Therapy Network, L.L.C., and TheraMatrix Physical Therapy Plan, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 26, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. Trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Shih

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 8, 2019
923 N.W.2d 286 (Mich. 2019)
Case details for

Anderson v. Shih

Case Details

Full title:LAVETA ANDERSON and CHARLES J. TAUNT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JENNY SHIH…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 8, 2019

Citations

923 N.W.2d 286 (Mich. 2019)