Anderson v. Jarrell

3 Citing cases

  1. State ex rel. Investment Corp. v. Board of Business Regulation

    227 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1969)   Cited 7 times

    See 2 Am.Jur.2d Administrative Law, ¶ 761 and 765; 1 Fla.Jur., Administrative Law, ¶ 224, 225, 226, 227. See Anderson v. Jarrell (1946), 157 Fla. 212, 25 So.2d 490. I believe similar reasoning is called for in the present case.

  2. Sargent v. Evening Independent

    62 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 1953)   Cited 3 times

    The fact that the employee in this case received, endorsed and cashed a check from the insurance carrier long after he had been paid by his employer the last payment for compensation due to him, did not extend the period of limitation. See Bulger v. Industrial Accident Commission of California, 218 Cal. 716, 24 P.2d 796; United Air Lines v. Industrial Commission, 364 Ill. 346, 4 N.E.2d 487; Anderson v. Jarrell, 157 Fla. 212, 25 So.2d 490; and Evans v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp., 216 Cal. 495, 14 P.2d 752. Affirmed.

  3. Meehan v. Crowder

    28 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1947)   Cited 13 times
    In Meehan v. Crowder, 158 Fla. 361, 28 So.2d 435 (1946), nephritis caused by poisonous fumes of solution of mercury bichloride penetrating the body and bloodstream of the claimant while washing a building with such solution was held compensable as caused by an "accident."

    In December, 1943, written notice was given, failure to give written notice is not a complete bar to recovery. See Anderson v. Jarrell, 157 Fla. 212, 25 So.2d 490. The commission's order, as well as the judgment before us, is challenged because they did not specifically find that the employer and carrier were not harmed by failure to given written notice. Some courts have made such requirement.