From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

June 18, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Saratoga County) to review five determinations of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose, Kane and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Petitioner was found guilty of numerous prison disciplinary violations in five separate determinations rendered by the Commissioner of Correctional Services. He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging them. The Attorney General has advised that the determinations at issue have been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and petitioner has been refunded the $5 surcharge with respect to each. Given that petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Gathers v Artus, 59 AD3d 795).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Anderson v. Huntington

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEREK ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. JOHN HUNTINGTON, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 1390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
880 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

In re Rivera

The Attorney General has advised that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all…

In re Hilbert Tunstall

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…