From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Housing Authority of Co. of San Mateo

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 31, 2008
No. C 05-01967 CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 05-01967 CRB.

March 31, 2008


ORDER


Now pending before the Court is plaintiff's motion to enforce the settlement agreement and for sanctions. After carefully considering the papers filed by the parties, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Local Rule 7-1(b), and DENIES plaintiff's motions. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that defendant is responsible for the delay in defendant's purchase of an annuity for plaintiff's benefit.

Before plaintiff files any new motions to enforce the settlement, plaintiff must meet and confer with defendants' counsel to determine if the dispute can be resolved without resort to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Housing Authority of Co. of San Mateo

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 31, 2008
No. C 05-01967 CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Anderson v. Housing Authority of Co. of San Mateo

Case Details

Full title:CONSTANCE ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 31, 2008

Citations

No. C 05-01967 CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2008)