From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Hienrich

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
20-CV-6867 YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-6867 YGR

09-17-2021

Ben Anderson,, Plaintiff, v. Joyce D. Hienrich, et al.,, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On August 16, 2021, plaintiff was directed to respond to certain defendants' motions to dismiss no later than 21 days after the date of such Order, or September 7, 2021. Otherwise, the action would be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 38.) As of the date of this Order, plaintiff has not filed a response, nor has he filed any other documents in this matter since the action was transferred to this District on October 1, 2020. (Dkt. No. 7.) Accordingly, this action is Dismissed Without Prejudice. All pending motions are terminated as moot.

It Is So Ordered.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Hienrich

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
20-CV-6867 YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Anderson v. Hienrich

Case Details

Full title:Ben Anderson,, Plaintiff, v. Joyce D. Hienrich, et al.,, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

20-CV-6867 YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)