From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Hiatt

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Nov 14, 2023
1:23CV902 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2023)

Opinion

1:23CV902

11-14-2023

JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF STEVE HIATT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Joi Elizabeth Peake United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee in Surry County, North Carolina, submitted a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The form of the Complaint is such that a serious flaw makes it impossible to further process the Complaint. The problem is:

1. Plaintiff's claim is unclear. Plaintiff states that he was injured when he slipped and fell on a puddle of water that accumulated from a leak in the roof of the jail where he is housed. He also names three Defendants. However, he does not explain how any of those persons were allegedly responsible for his fall. Plaintiff must name the persons who are actually responsible for the alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Further, he should be aware that he cannot name persons simply because they are supervisors over the jail or its staff. Theories of respondeat superior or liability predicated solely on a defendant's identity as a supervisor do not form a basis for a claim under § 1983. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677 (2009). Also, the allegations in the Complaint appear perhaps consistent with negligence, but negligence does not state a claim under § 1983. Instead, § 1983 covers only violations of a plaintiff's rights through intentional action or deliberate indifference. Plaintiff must make it clear that any named Defendants engaged in at least deliberate indifference if he seeks to raise a claim against them and he must set out facts supporting that allegation.

Consequently, the Complaint should be dismissed, but without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defect of the present Complaint. To further aid Plaintiff, the Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff new § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed In forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Hiatt

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Nov 14, 2023
1:23CV902 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Anderson v. Hiatt

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF STEVE HIATT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 14, 2023

Citations

1:23CV902 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2023)