From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 4, 2008
No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P.

January 4, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 1, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 1, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 4, 2008
No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Anderson v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS CARTER ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. W. HARTLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 4, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2008)