From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2007
No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P.

October 12, 2007


ORDER


On September 28, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed September 11, 2007, ordering that plaintiff file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment within thirty days. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed September 11, 2007, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2007
No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Anderson v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS CARTER ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. W. HARTLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 12, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0817 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2007)