Anderson v. Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities

2 Citing cases

  1. Manago v. Cnty. of Cook

    2013 Ill. App. 121365 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013)   Cited 3 times

    ¶ 27 The County lastly argues the trial court erred in striking and extinguishing the lien on the ground the trial court awarded no damages for medical expenses in the personal injury lawsuit. On this point, we find Anderson v. Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities, 305 Ill. App. 3d 262 (1999), highly instructive. In Anderson, this court interpreted the prior version of the Act, which provided:

  2. Manago v. Cnty. of Cook

    2016 Ill. App. 121365 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016)   Cited 4 times
    Stating "[h]ere, we look at the [Lien] Act and the family expenses statute in harmony so that the goal of the legislature can be accomplished"

    Burrell, 176 Ill.2d at 179, 223 Ill.Dec. 457, 679 N.E.2d 1230 (Harrison, J., dissenting); see People ex rel. Community High School District No. 231, 2 Ill.2d at 448, 118 N.E.2d 328. Our initial opinion in this matter relied on dicta in Anderson v. Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities, 305 Ill.App.3d 262, 238 Ill.Dec. 509, 711 N.E.2d 1170 (1999), suggesting that removing the phrase “based on the negligent or wrongful act” from the prior version of the Act “would permit the lien to be attached to any verdict or judgment recovered by the injured person.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)