From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Cunningham

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 27, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00418-MSK-PAC (MEH) (D. Colo. Jul. 27, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00418-MSK-PAC (MEH).

July 27, 2007


MINUTE ORDER


Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [filed July 11, 2007; Doc #24] is denied. Generally, it is the policy in this district court not to stay discovery pending a ruling on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), unless a defense of qualified immunity is raised. See Workman v. Jordan, 958 F.2d 332, 336 (10th Cir. 1992).


Summaries of

Anderson v. Cunningham

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 27, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00418-MSK-PAC (MEH) (D. Colo. Jul. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Anderson v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. MIKE CUNNINGHAM, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 27, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00418-MSK-PAC (MEH) (D. Colo. Jul. 27, 2007)