Opinion
2019–13108
06-10-2020
In the Matter of Joel ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. Mark D. COHEN, etc., et al., Respondents.
Joel Anderson, Riverhead, NY, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Melissa Ysaguirre of counsel), for respondent Mark D. Cohen. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Timothy F. Flanagan of counsel), respondent pro se.
Joel Anderson, Riverhead, NY, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Melissa Ysaguirre of counsel), for respondent Mark D. Cohen.
Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Timothy F. Flanagan of counsel), respondent pro se.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER, BETSY BARROS, JJ.
DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from taking further action in a criminal action entitled People v. Anderson, pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Indictment No. 1323/19, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569, 528 N.Y.S.2d 21, 523 N.E.2d 297 ; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352, 509 N.Y.S.2d 493, 502 N.E.2d 170 ). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.
DILLON, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and BARROS, JJ., concur.