From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Summary

In Anderson v. City of New York (243 App. Div. 731) the question of the applicability of the doctrine was not raised. (See Fetterman v. Title Guarantee Trust Co., 254 App. Div. 704.) Lazansky, P.J., concurs with Taylor, J.

Summary of this case from FATA v. S.A. HEALY COMPANY

Opinion

February, 1935.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ.


Action to foreclose a lien against moneys due and to become due under a contract between certain defendants and the city of New York. The lien was for an amount alleged to be the difference between wages paid plaintiff and the prevailing rate. Judgment dismissing complaint unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was no proof of compliance with section 220 Lab. of the Labor Law.


Summaries of

Anderson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

In Anderson v. City of New York (243 App. Div. 731) the question of the applicability of the doctrine was not raised. (See Fetterman v. Title Guarantee Trust Co., 254 App. Div. 704.) Lazansky, P.J., concurs with Taylor, J.

Summary of this case from FATA v. S.A. HEALY COMPANY
Case details for

Anderson v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MATT ANDERSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and Others, Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

FATA v. S.A. HEALY COMPANY

) The plaintiff's contention that he is a third-party beneficiary of the contract is untenable. Before the…