Summary
In Anderson v. City of New York (243 App. Div. 731) the question of the applicability of the doctrine was not raised. (See Fetterman v. Title Guarantee Trust Co., 254 App. Div. 704.) Lazansky, P.J., concurs with Taylor, J.
Summary of this case from FATA v. S.A. HEALY COMPANYOpinion
February, 1935.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ.
Action to foreclose a lien against moneys due and to become due under a contract between certain defendants and the city of New York. The lien was for an amount alleged to be the difference between wages paid plaintiff and the prevailing rate. Judgment dismissing complaint unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was no proof of compliance with section 220 Lab. of the Labor Law.