From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. City of Daytona Beach

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 21, 2022
No. SC22-585 (Fla. Jun. 21, 2022)

Opinion

SC22-585

06-21-2022

IRIS LAMAR ANDERSON Petitioner(s) v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, ET AL. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 642022CA030245XXXXCI

The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby dismissed because this Court generally will not consider the repetitive petitions of persons who have abused the judicial processes of the lower courts such that they have been barred from filing certain actions there. See Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930, 931 (Fla. 2000). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court.

POLSTON, LABARGA, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

HON. MARY GRIFFO JOLLEY, JUDGE


Summaries of

Anderson v. City of Daytona Beach

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 21, 2022
No. SC22-585 (Fla. Jun. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Anderson v. City of Daytona Beach

Case Details

Full title:IRIS LAMAR ANDERSON Petitioner(s) v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, ET AL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 21, 2022

Citations

No. SC22-585 (Fla. Jun. 21, 2022)