From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Charles Schwab & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2013
No.: 3:12-cv-01682-MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No.: 3:12-cv-01682-MMC

03-18-2013

JACQUELINE ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES SCHWAB AND COMPANY, INC., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.

Deborah J. Broyles (SBN 167681) Tiffany Renee Thomas (SBN 239085) REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Murlene J. Randle Attorneys for Plaintiff Jacqueline Anderson


Deborah J. Broyles (SBN 167681)
Tiffany Renee Thomas (SBN 239085)
REED SMITH LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXTENDING DEFENDANT CHARLES

SCHWAB & CO., INC.'S TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Plaintiff Jacqueline Anderson ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on January 11, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order seeking leave for Plaintiff's filing of a Third Amended Complaint [Doc 19];

WHEREAS, on January 15, 2013, this Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a Third Amended Complaint [Doc. 20];

WHEREAS, on January 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint [Doc. 21];

WHEREAS, the Third Amended Complaint contains 270 separate and distinct paragraphs;

WHEREAS, Defendant intends to file an answer to the Third Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to, and the court granted, an extension of Defendant's time to file its answer to March 1, 2013 [Docs. 22, 24]

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to, and the court granted, an extension of Defendant's time to file its answer to March 15, 2013 [Docs. 22, 24]

WHEREAS, Defendant will be unable to complete its Answer by March 15, 2013;

WHEREAS, an extension of time will not affect the case management schedule for this action; and

WHEREAS, the instant Stipulation and [Proposed] Order constitutes the parties' third request for a time modification in this action.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff and Defendant that:

Pursuant to this stipulation, the parties agree to continue Defendant's deadline to file its responsive pleading to the Third Amended Complaint from March 1, 2013 to March 22, 2013.

SO STIPULATED.

REED SMITH, LLP

By: _______________

Deborah J. Broyles

Tiffany Renee Thomas

Attorneys for Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Law Offices of Murlene J. Randle

By: _______________

Murlene J. Randle

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jacqueline Anderson

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. must file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff Jacqueline Anderson's Third Amended Complaint no later than March 22, 2013. Given the limited nature of the amendments and defendant's having been aware of said amendments no later than January 17, 2013, however, such extension shall not constitute good cause to amend the Pretrial Preparation Order in any manner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

The Honorable Maxine Chesney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Anderson v. Charles Schwab & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2013
No.: 3:12-cv-01682-MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Anderson v. Charles Schwab & Co.

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES SCHWAB AND COMPANY, INC., and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

No.: 3:12-cv-01682-MMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)