From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Burkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 29, 2024
CV 2:24-01761 MRA (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2024)

Opinion

CV 2:24-01761 MRA (RAO)

09-29-2024

ALAN ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MÓNICA RAMÍREZ ALMADANI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation (the “Amended Report”). The time for filing objections to the Amended Report has passed, and no objections have been received. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied as moot and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Burkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 29, 2024
CV 2:24-01761 MRA (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Anderson v. Burkholz

Case Details

Full title:ALAN ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 29, 2024

Citations

CV 2:24-01761 MRA (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2024)