From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1948
273 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

March 17, 1948.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.


Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: In view of the disposition herein made, we do not at this time determine whether the six-year or the ten-year Statute of Limitations applies. That question may be raised again when the real situation is disclosed from the pleadings or by facts appearing upon the trial. (See Goldstein v. Schachne, 261 App. Div. 922; Hurley v. Hurley, 266 App. Div. 701.) All concur. (The order denies defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint in an action to declare a quitclaim deed null and void.)


Summaries of

Anderson v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1948
273 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Anderson v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:MAE L. ANDERSON, Respondent, v. HELEN P. BROWN, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Matter of Nelson v. Kelly

The respondent has failed to affirmatively sustain, at this time, the burden to prove that this petition is…