From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 15, 2011
3:11-cv-00590-ECR-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00590-ECR-RAM

08-15-2011

RICHARD ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a civil rights complaint. Neither a filing fee nor an application to proceed in forma pauperis was received with the complaint. Plaintiff further did not use the required complaint form for the entirety of his complaint. It does not appear from the allegations presented that a promptly filed new action would be time-barred under the applicable two-year statute of limitations.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a new properly commenced action under a new docket number with either the required filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

The Clerk shall send plaintiff two copies each of an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner and a blank Section 1983 complaint form, along with the instructions for each form and a copy of the papers that he submitted.

The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice.

EDWARD C. REED

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Anderson v. Bannister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 15, 2011
3:11-cv-00590-ECR-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Anderson v. Bannister

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BANNISTER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 15, 2011

Citations

3:11-cv-00590-ECR-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2011)