From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 23, 2009
Civil Action 09-00531-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Nov. 23, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action 09-00531-KD-B.

November 23, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated November 20, 2009, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, for good cause shown and because no answer has been filed, it is ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) is GRANTED and this action is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), so that the Commissioner can locate or reconstruct the claim file regarding the Administrative Law Judge's April 5, 2007 decision.

Under this remand pursuant to sentence six of Section 405(g), Plaintiff is not a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. See, Shalala v. Schafer, 509 U.S. 292, 297-298 and 300-302, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2629 and 2631-2632, 125 L.Ed. 2d 239 (1993).

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 23, 2009
Civil Action 09-00531-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Nov. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Anderson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DELOIS B. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Nov 23, 2009

Citations

Civil Action 09-00531-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Nov. 23, 2009)