From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 9, 2010
Civil 09-2091 (JRT/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Civil 09-2091 (JRT/SRN).

July 9, 2010

Edward Olson, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiff.

Lonnie Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated June 15, 2010, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED; and
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 9, 2010
Civil 09-2091 (JRT/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Anderson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 9, 2010

Citations

Civil 09-2091 (JRT/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 9, 2010)

Citing Cases

Cerveny v. Saul

Rather, she considered Dr. Dees' opinion in the context of the entire record, adopting his conclusions to…