Anderson v. ANGS Grp., Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Austin v. Kroger Tex. L.P.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1169-B (N.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2016)   Cited 5 times

    See Vais Arms, Inc. v. Vais, 383 F.3d 287, 292 (5th Cir. 2004). Thus, courts have allowed litigants to file surreplies on summary judgment when the movants used their reply briefs to: (1) introduce new evidence, Simmons v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. H-06-1820, 2006 WL 3447684, at *1 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2006); (2) assert a new defense to liability, Anderson v. Angs Grp., Inc., No. 3:12CV272, 2013 WL 485870, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 6, 2013); or (3) cite a supposedly analogous case for the first time, Salomon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. EP-10-CV-106, 2010 WL 2545593, at *2 (W.D. Tex. June 21, 2010). The decisive question here, then, is whether Kroger raised the argument at issue in its summary judgment motion.