From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ander v. Ross

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1837
2 Del. 276 (Del. Super. Ct. 1837)

Opinion

Fall Sessions, 1837.

NARR. in assumpsit.

Rogers and Wootten, for plaintiff.

Cullen and Frame, for defendants.


In this case the plaintiff offered in evidence the deposition of Cannon Dawson, taken on a commission directed to Joseph Olds, of Pickaway county Ohio, authorizing him to examine witnesses to be brought before him, they being first sworn before him. It was objected to, because it did not appear that the witness was sworn by the commissioner.

The jurat showed that the witness was sworn in the presence of the commissioner by a magistrate of the county of Pickaway. The court overruled the objection, and admitted the deposition.


Summaries of

Ander v. Ross

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1837
2 Del. 276 (Del. Super. Ct. 1837)
Case details for

Ander v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ANDER vs. CURTIS J. and CHARLES H. ROSS

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1837

Citations

2 Del. 276 (Del. Super. Ct. 1837)