From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andalman v. Behrens

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 5, 1926
126 Misc. 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)

Opinion

February 5, 1926.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York.

O'Brien, Malevinsky Driscoll [ Edward C. Raftery of counsel], for the appellant.

Tobias A. Keppler, for the respondent.


The plaintiff recovered judgment in the sum of $1,475.95 for legal services rendered to the defendants in litigation involving the sum of $1,900. We regard this award of the jury out of proportion to the amount involved and the work done. The services rendered were the preparation for and the prosecution of the ordinary law suit which involved no legal complexities. The plaintiff already has received a retainer of $200. An additional sum of $500 will, in our judgment, reasonably compensate him for the services rendered. The judgment appealed from is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event unless within ten days after the entry of the order the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment to the sum of $500, with interest and costs, in which event judgment as so modified affirmed, without costs of appeal to either party.

All concur; present, BIJUR, DELEHANTY and WAGNER, JJ.


Summaries of

Andalman v. Behrens

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 5, 1926
126 Misc. 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
Case details for

Andalman v. Behrens

Case Details

Full title:MAXWELL N. ANDALMAN, Respondent, v. ALFRED K. BEHRENS and Another…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1926

Citations

126 Misc. 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
214 N.Y.S. 49