From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ancowitz v. Sweeney

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 16, 1959
21 Misc. 2d 259 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

November 16, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, MEYER TOBIAS, J.

Raphael, Searles, Levin Vischi ( William Levin of counsel), for appellant.

William F. Laffan, Jr., for respondents.


Tenants are not entitled to recover for the plumbing and exterminating expenses which they voluntarily incurred ( Perlmutter v. Timely Toys, 8 A.D.2d 834; Davar Holdings v. Cohen, 255 App. Div. 445, affd. 280 N.Y. 828; Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. 108 W. 49th St. Corp., 255 App. Div. 570).

The final order should be unanimously modified upon the law and facts by dismissing tenants' counterclaim on the merits and increasing landlord's recovery to $333.52, with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal.

Concur — PETTE, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.

Final order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Ancowitz v. Sweeney

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 16, 1959
21 Misc. 2d 259 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Ancowitz v. Sweeney

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ANCOWITZ, Appellant, v. FRANK M. SWEENEY et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1959

Citations

21 Misc. 2d 259 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
199 N.Y.S.2d 736