From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ancar v. Robertson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 29, 2019
CIVIL ACTION 18-3-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. May. 29, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 18-3-SDD-RLB

05-29-2019

ALLEN ANCAR v. RANDALL ROBERTSON, ET AL.


RULING

The Court has carefully considered the Motion, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated May 9, 2019, to which an objection was filed and also reviewed.

Rec. Doc. 49.

Rec. Doc. 59.

Rec. Doc. 60.

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

ACCORDINGLY, the Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc 49) is hereby GRANTED, dismissing the Plaintiff's claims against Defendants, Robertson and Folk, with prejudice. It is further recommended that the Plaintiff's claims against Trish Foster are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely effect service upon her.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 29 day of May, 2019.

/s/ _________

SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Ancar v. Robertson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 29, 2019
CIVIL ACTION 18-3-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. May. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Ancar v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN ANCAR v. RANDALL ROBERTSON, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 29, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 18-3-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. May. 29, 2019)