From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anbang Grp. Holdings Co. v. Haibin Zhou

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-00998-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-00998-VC

08-02-2023

ANBANG GROUP HOLDINGS CO. LIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HAIBIN ZHOU, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

RE: DKT. NO. 61

VINCE CHHABRIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The motion for reconsideration is granted. The court clerk's decision not to enter default as to Amer Group and AB Stable Group was error. Alternative service through the Delaware Secretary of State, without a prior court order, satisfies Rule 4(e). Because the plaintiffs could not “by due diligence” serve these defendants using other specified means, service through the Delaware Secretary of State was proper. Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-105. No court order was necessary. See id.

The clerk's error was understandable; California law does require court permission before serving a California corporation through the California Secretary of State. See Cal. Corp. Code § 17701.16. But it was error all the same. Because it would be wasteful to have the plaintiffs spend more time and resources on service, the clerk is directed to enter default as to Amer Group and AB Stable Group.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anbang Grp. Holdings Co. v. Haibin Zhou

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-00998-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Anbang Grp. Holdings Co. v. Haibin Zhou

Case Details

Full title:ANBANG GROUP HOLDINGS CO. LIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HAIBIN ZHOU, et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 2, 2023

Citations

23-cv-00998-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)