Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-2065
04-25-2017
MAGDALENA ANAYA, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON INDEPENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al, Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Court's Memorandum and Recommendation Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 7, 2017 (Doc. #39). The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Cruz v. Colvin, No. 7:14-CV-780, 2016 WL 728182, at *1 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2016). Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
As noted by the Fifth Circuit, "[t]he advisory committee's note to Rule 72(b) states that, '[w]hen no timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'" Douglas v. United Services Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P.72(b) advisory committee's note (1983)) superseded by statute on other grounds by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), as stated in ACS Recovery Servs., Inc v. Griffin, No. 11-40446, 2012 WL 1071216, at *7 n.5 (5th Cir. April 2, 2012). --------
It is so ORDERED. APR 25 2017
Date
/s/_________
The Honorable Alfred H. Bennett
United States District Judge