From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anaya v. Campbell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No 2:07-CV-0029GGHP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No 2:07-CV-0029GGHP

09-20-2011

Richard Ernest Anaya Plaintiff(s) v. Rosanne Campbell et. al. Defendants.

Brian K. Wanerman Attorney for Plaintiff(s)


REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INCUR

COSTS (APPOINTED COUNSEL) AND

REQUEST FOR PAYMENT

REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES

Complete this form and return it to the court (with two copies) for approval prior to incurring the cost for which reimbursement is requested.

I, Brian K. Wanerman, attorney for plaintiff(s), declare as follows:

I was appointed to represent plaintiff(s) in this action on June 3, 2011, by the Honorable Gregory G. Hollows, United States District Judge/Magistrate. I believe that the following course of action is reasonably necessary to the prosecution of this action:

Express delivery of copies of plaintiff's C-File from Kern Valley State Prison to attorney's office at 711 Ninth Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95814 for the purpose of creating exhibits to support attorney's declaration in support of plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment

(e.g., deposition of __________, defendant herein).

I have made reasonable inquiry and believe that the cost of this course of action will not exceed the amount of $ 55026

I therefore request that this court authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed that stated above for the completion of this contemplated course of action.

The following payments of costs have been heretofore approved in this matter:

+-------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦Amount¦ ¦Amount Approved ¦Purpose¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Paid ¦ +----------------+-------+------¦ +----------------+-------+------¦ +----------------+-------+------¦ +----------------+-------+------¦ +----------------+-------+------¦ +----------------+-------+------¦ +-------------------------------+

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signed this 2nd day of August 2011, at Sacramento, California.

Brian K. Wanerman

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)

The above expenditure is Approved __________ Denied Or, __________ Good cause appearing therefore, this matter is set for discovery conference, pursuant to rule __________, on__________ , at __________, __________.M. in Courtroom Number

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States District Judge/Magistrate


Summaries of

Anaya v. Campbell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No 2:07-CV-0029GGHP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Anaya v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:Richard Ernest Anaya Plaintiff(s) v. Rosanne Campbell et. al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

No 2:07-CV-0029GGHP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)