From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anaya v. Anaya

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 8, 2008
987 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 5D07-3477.

August 8, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Alan S. Apte, Judge.

Francisco Colon, Jr., Maitland, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Marco Anaya challenges the imputation of income and equitable distribution scheme contained in a final judgment of dissolution. He contends that the trial court failed to make the required findings of fact to support either determination. However, he did not bring these alleged inadequacies to the attention of the trial court by filing a motion for rehearing. A party may not complain about "inadequate findings in a dissolution case unless the alleged defect was brought to the trial court's attention in a motion for rehearing." Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); see also Matajek v. Skowronska, 927 So.2d 981, 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Accordingly, Anaya has failed to preserve these issues for appellate review.

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anaya v. Anaya

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 8, 2008
987 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Anaya v. Anaya

Case Details

Full title:Marco ANAYA, Appellant, v. Amy ANAYA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 8, 2008

Citations

987 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Welch v. Welch

To the extent the trial court could and should have made more detailed findings to explain its precise…

Welch v. Welch

See Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.530 (providing that motions for rehearing "shall be governed by Florida Rule of…