From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anastasio v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2019
170 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8802 Index 31677/17E

03-26-2019

Victor ANASTASIO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, Defendant–Appellant.

Ansa Assuncao, LLP, White Plains (Thomas O. O'Connor of counsel), for appellant. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.


Ansa Assuncao, LLP, White Plains (Thomas O. O'Connor of counsel), for appellant.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Gische, Gesmer, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered April 25, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on forum non conveniens grounds, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a resident of Staten Island, properly commenced this action in the courts of this State against defendant, a resident of, among others, Bronx County (see McKinney's Uncons. Laws of N.Y. § 7106 [L. 1950, ch. 301, § 6]; see also Bacon v. Nygard, 160 A.D.3d 565, 565, 76 N.Y.S.3d 27 [1st Dept. 2018] ). Defendant has failed to tender proof, in admissible form, that nonparties would be inconvenienced by plaintiff's prosecution of this action in New York State, and defendant's own convenience is irrelevant (see Stavredes v. United Skates of Am., 87 A.D.2d 502, 502, 447 N.Y.S.2d 478 [1st Dept. 1982] ). "Moreover, given the relative proximity of New York and New Jersey, ... it is not likely that [defendant] will experience any undue hardship as a result of litigating in New York" ( Hall v. Camacho, 158 A.D.3d 422, 423, 67 N.Y.S.3d 814 [1st Dept. 2018] ).

Ultimately, although plaintiff's accident occurred in New Jersey, and New Jersey is an available alternate forum, the balance of equities does not lie so strongly in defendant's favor as to justify disturbing plaintiff's choice of forum (see Waterways Ltd. v. Barclays Bank PLC, 174 A.D.2d 324, 327, 571 N.Y.S.2d 208 [1st Dept. 1991] ).


Summaries of

Anastasio v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2019
170 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Anastasio v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Case Details

Full title:Victor Anastasio, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Port Authority of New York and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 26, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
97 N.Y.S.3d 33
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 2287

Citing Cases

Kagnovskaya v. Island Auto Grp.

Notably, the relative proximity of New York and New Jersey, and the frequency of travel between the two…