From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anastaciou v. Prince West

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 29, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-CV-03732 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:21-CV-03732

11-29-2022

LUCIANO ANASTACIOU, Plaintiff, v. PRINCE WEST, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORALBLE ALFRED H. BENNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho's Memorandum and Recommendation filed on November 14, 2022. Doc. #29. The deadline for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation for clear error. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #21) and Motion to Strike (Doc. #27) are both GRANTED. Plaintiff Luciano Anastaciou's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. #23) is STRICKEN as untimely, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anastaciou v. Prince West

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 29, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-CV-03732 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Anastaciou v. Prince West

Case Details

Full title:LUCIANO ANASTACIOU, Plaintiff, v. PRINCE WEST, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:21-CV-03732 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2022)