From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 6, 2024
No. 2022-1536 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2024)

Opinion

2022-1536

03-06-2024

ANALOG DEVICES, INC., Appellant v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

JASJIT S. VIDWAN, ArentFox Schiff LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by TANIEL E. ANDERSON, RICHARD J. BERMAN, JANINE A. CARLAN. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by OMAR FAROOQ AMIN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, PETER JOHN SAWERT.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01210.

JASJIT S. VIDWAN, ArentFox Schiff LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by TANIEL E. ANDERSON, RICHARD J. BERMAN, JANINE A. CARLAN.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by OMAR FAROOQ

AMIN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, PETER JOHN SAWERT.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM.

MOORE, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 6, 2024
No. 2022-1536 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal

Case Details

Full title:ANALOG DEVICES, INC., Appellant v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 2024

Citations

No. 2022-1536 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2024)