From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anaeme v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Nov 8, 2011
No. 3:11-cv-1160-ST (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-1161-ST.

November 8, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#5) on October 7, 2011, in which she recommends that this Court grant plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismiss his Complaint with prejudice because it fails to state a claim and is frivolous. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#5). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint [2] is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [3] is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 4 day of Nov, 2011.


Summaries of

Anaeme v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Nov 8, 2011
No. 3:11-cv-1160-ST (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Anaeme v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:CHIBUEZE C. ANAEME, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-1160-ST (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2011)

Citing Cases

Anaeme v. United States

Many courts have already explained why Mr. Anaeme's desired defendants are largely immune from suit, that he…