From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AMY v. BD. OF EDUC., CARMEL CENT. SCH. DIST

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1993
199 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 27, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

By order dated March 26, 1992, the Justice presiding over this case sua sponte recused himself and noted that the plaintiffs had requested a change of venue. However, the order did not change venue. Thus, the appellants are not aggrieved by the order. In any event, in this case, the court could only change venue upon a formal motion by the plaintiffs (see, Agway, Inc. v Kervin, 188 A.D.2d 1076; Kelson v Nedicks Stores, 104 A.D.2d 315; Korman v City of New York, 89 A.D.2d 888). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

AMY v. BD. OF EDUC., CARMEL CENT. SCH. DIST

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1993
199 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

AMY v. BD. OF EDUC., CARMEL CENT. SCH. DIST

Case Details

Full title:AMY L.M. et al., Respondents, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CARMEL CENTRAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 5