From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amu v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jul 5, 2024
No. 5969-24S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 5, 2024)

Opinion

5969-24S

07-05-2024

ISHMAEL AMU, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On May 30, 2024, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the grounds that petitioner has not been issued any notice of deficiency, nor has respondent made any other determination, sufficient to confer jurisdiction on this Court as to petitioner's 2021 and 2022 tax years. Although the Court provided petitioner the opportunity to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion, petitioner has not done so.

Like all federal courts, the Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction. Internal Revenue Code section 7442 does not provide this Court with jurisdiction to review all tax-related issues. As petitioner has not produced any notice of deficiency or demonstrated that respondent made any other determination that would permit petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court as to petitioner's 2021 and 2022 tax years, the Court is obliged to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction.

Upon due consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Amu v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jul 5, 2024
No. 5969-24S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Amu v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ISHMAEL AMU, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jul 5, 2024

Citations

No. 5969-24S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 5, 2024)