From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ampfer v. State of New York

Court of Claims
Jun 30, 1952
203 Misc. 93 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1952)

Opinion

June 30, 1952.

Isidor Bleich for claimants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Burns F. Barford of counsel), for defendant.


The State's motion made during trial to dismiss each of the claims is granted. Damages to abutting owners for changes in grade of streets, as claimed herein, are damnum absque injuria. ( Radcliff's Executors v. Mayor of Brooklyn, 4 N.Y. 195; Sauer v. City of New York, 180 N.Y. 27, affd. 206 U.S. 536.) In the instant situation there may be no recovery against the State in the absence of statutory authorization therefor. ( Sauer v. City of New York, supra; Matter of Young v. Kracke, 262 A.D. 67, affd. 287 N.Y. 634; Burmaster v. State of New York, 186 A.D. 131; West 158th St. Garage Corp. v. State of New York, 256 A.D. 401; Miller v. State of New York, 229 A.D. 423.)

The provisions of article XII-B of the Highway Law, relating to State arterial highways passing through cities and under which the work was done, do not sustain the claimants' contention of statutory liability on the part of the State. ( Jeran Realty Corp. v. State of New York, 194 Misc. 492.)

Let judgment be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Ampfer v. State of New York

Court of Claims
Jun 30, 1952
203 Misc. 93 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1952)
Case details for

Ampfer v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRED C. AMPFER, Claimant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Defendant. (Claim No…

Court:Court of Claims

Date published: Jun 30, 1952

Citations

203 Misc. 93 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1952)
114 N.Y.S.2d 205