Opinion
2:21-cv-00470-MCE-JDP
06-14-2021
COURTNEY AMOS, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY SIMMONS, individually and in his official capacity, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, and DOES 1-20, inclusive Defendants.
DANA A. SUNTAG (State Bar No. 125127) JOSHUA J. STEVENS (State Bar No. 238105) HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG A California Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
DANA A. SUNTAG (State Bar No. 125127)
JOSHUA J. STEVENS (State Bar No. 238105)
HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG
A California Professional Corporation
Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO CONDUCT RULE 26(f)
CONFERENCE [No hearing required]
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
RECITALS
A. On March 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit.
B. On March 16, 2021, the Court issued an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. The Order stated, among other things, that within 60 days of service of the complaint on any party, the parties were required to meet and confer as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) regarding their discovery plan.
C. On April 8, 2021, Plaintiff served process on Defendant County of San Joaquin (the “County”).
D. On April 29, 2021, the County filed a motion to dismiss the only claim against it, the Second Claim.
E. The motion has been fully briefed and the Court has taken it under submission.
F. Counsel for the parties have discussed the deadline for the Rule 26(f) conference, and believe it would be cost-effective to defer it until there is a ruling on the motion.
STIPULATION
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their counsel of record, that the deadline to conduct the Rule 26(f) conference be extended until 28 days after the Court issues a ruling on the pending motion to dismiss.