From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amoroso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 30, 1986
487 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-2213.

April 30, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Richard B. Burk, J.

Frank B. Kessler, Lake Worth, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Teitler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We have considered the several points on appeal and, except for sentencing, find that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines and enhanced defendant's sentence to ten (10) years incarceration. This was error.

The trial court orally stated several reasons for the departure, none of which, according to well-established case law, are legally sufficient. In light of this insufficiency, it would be pointless to remand for a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) and Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), approved 478 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1985).

We reverse the sentence and remand with directions that the trial court impose a sentence within the sentencing guidelines.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amoroso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 30, 1986
487 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Amoroso v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES AMOROSO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 30, 1986

Citations

487 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)