Opinion
June, 1915.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Ingraham, P.J., and Laughlin, J., dissented on the ground that plaintiff showed nominal damages only.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Amoroso v. Fruit Auction Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Summaries of
Amoroso v. Fruit Auction Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for
Amoroso v. Fruit Auction Company
Case Details
Full title:Santi Amoroso, Respondent, v. The Fruit Auction Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1915
Citations
169 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)