Opinion
NO. 29512
12-22-2011
Terry G. Oppermann for Plaintiff-Appellant Kyle K. Chang Curtis E. Sherwood for Defendants-Appellees City and County of Honolulu, Kyle Ho, Tracy Dantsuka, Benjamin Mahi, Dan Nakasato, and Nyle Dolera
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HA WAIT REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 05-1-1108)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Nakamura, Chief Judge, Foley and Leonard, JJ.)
Plaintiff-Appellant Leslie A. Among (Among) appeals from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit's (Circuit Court) Judgment Pursuant To Special Verdict, in favor of Defendants-Appellees Harry J. Schwenker, City and County of Honolulu, Honolulu Police Department (HPD) Officer Kyle Ho, HPD Officer Tracy Dantsuka, HPD Officer Benjamin Mahi, HPD Officer Dan Nakasato, GMR LLC, Phil Russell and Associates, Ltd., Honolulu Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc., Prosecutor Keith Kaneshiro, Deputy Prosecutor Kevin S. Teruya, HPD Police Chief Louis M. Kealoha, Acting Major, HPD Internal Affairs, Nyle Dolera, and HPD Department of Internal Affairs, and against Among, filed on November 12, 2008, in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit Court). ,
The Honorable Eden E. Hifo presided.
Pursuant to Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HEAP) Rule 43(b), Keith Kaneshiro and Louis M. Kealoha are substituted for former Chief of the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu and Chief of Police, respectively.
Among raises five points of error on appeal, arguing that the Circuit Court erred by:
(1) Denying his Motion For Summary Judgment and Motion For Reconsideration because, as a matter of law, the police lacked probable cause to arrest him;
(2) Declining to apply State v. Keawe, 107 Hawai'i 1, 108 P.3d 304 (2005) ;
(3) Denying the admission of Among's Exhibits 16, 17, at 18;
(4) Declining to adopt Among's Proposed Jury Instructions and Proposed Special Verdict Forms; and
(5) Denying Among's motion in limine to exclude a report of an alleged knife incident between Among and Schwenker.
Among's "Points On Appeal" fail to comply with HRAP Rule 28(b)(4), as they do not state where the alleged errors occurred and were objected to, nor do they include "a quotation of the grounds urged for the objection and the full substance of the evidence admitted or rejected[,]" as it relates to his evidentiary point of error, as required by HRAP Rule 28(b) (4) (A).
--------
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we conclude that Among's contentions have no merit.
Accordingly, the Circuit Court's November 12, 2008 Judgment Pursuant to Special Verdict is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 22, 2011.
On the briefs:
Terry G. Oppermann
for Plaintiff-Appellant
Kyle K. Chang
Curtis E. Sherwood
for Defendants-Appellees
City and County of Honolulu,
Kyle Ho, Tracy Dantsuka,
Benjamin Mahi, Dan Nakasato,
and Nyle Dolera
Chief Judge
Associate Judge
Associate Judge