From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ammerman v. Gardner

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 18, 2009
3:08-cv-1026 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2009)

Opinion

3:08-cv-1026.

February 18, 2009


DECISION and ORDER


Plaintiffs commenced the instant action seeking to recover damages arising out of an automobile accident. Defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that Plaintiff failed to plead that he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102. In response to the motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint pleading serious injury. The filing of an Amended Complaint supercedes a prior Complaint and typically moots the motion to dismiss. See Byng v. Campbell, 2009 WL 152708 (N.D.N.Y. 2009). Because the motion to dismiss is directed only to the original Complaint and the Amended Complaint cures the defects raised in the motion to dismiss, the motion to dismiss is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ammerman v. Gardner

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 18, 2009
3:08-cv-1026 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Ammerman v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS AMMERMAN and JENNIFER AMMERMAN, Plaintiffs, v. BRUCE GARDNER…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Feb 18, 2009

Citations

3:08-cv-1026 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2009)