From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amityville Dev. Corp. v. Town of Babylon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1968
30 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

October 7, 1968


Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 20, 1968, which (1) denied plaintiff's motion to dismiss the separate defense in defendant's answer and (2) granted defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint, reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements; plaintiff's motion granted; and defendant's cross motion denied. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. In our opinion the cause of action pleaded in the complaint accrued at the earliest on April 4, 1967, when the defendant town first refused to pay for one of the items claimed (cf. Edlux Constr. Corp. v. State of New York, 252 App. Div. 373, 374-375; Rason Asphalt v. Town of Oyster Bay, 8 Misc.2d 411, 414-415, mod. on other grounds 6 A.D.2d 810). Consequently, the filing of the notice of claim with the Town Clerk on July 12, 1967 was timely under the statute (see Town Law, § 65, subd. 3). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amityville Dev. Corp. v. Town of Babylon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1968
30 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Amityville Dev. Corp. v. Town of Babylon

Case Details

Full title:AMITYVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORP., Appellant, v. TOWN OF BABYLON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Inform Applications, Inc. v. Town of Brookhaven

Town Law § 65(3) provides that “no action shall be maintained against a town upon or arising out of a…

Braslow v. Barnett

Plaintiffs continue the reference to Teresta and then state on page 3 of their supplementary memorandum of…