From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amiri v. Gelman Management Company

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 19, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1864 (JDB) (D.D.C. Jun. 19, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1864 (JDB).

June 19, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Defendants argue that plaintiff's "nine-page, stream-of-consciousness, hand-written Complaint," Defs.' Mot. to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ¶ 3, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. They move to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See id. ¶¶ 6-24. The motion simply recites each of plaintiff's claims and then states the conclusion that there is a failure to state a claim. Wholly absent from defendants' motion is any substantive argument for dismissal or citation to authority other than the federal rule on which they rely. The Court will deny the motion without prejudice, and will direct defendants to file a dispositive motion which "shall include or be accompanied by a statement of the specific points of law and authority that support the motion, including where appropriate a concise statement of facts." LCvR 7(a).

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Amiri v. Gelman Management Company

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 19, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1864 (JDB) (D.D.C. Jun. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Amiri v. Gelman Management Company

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL WAKIL AMIRI, Plaintiff, v. GELMAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 19, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1864 (JDB) (D.D.C. Jun. 19, 2009)