From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amin v. Franmar Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
Case No.: C11-04231 JSC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: C11-04231 JSC

10-11-2011

QUAIS AMIN, Plaintiff, v. FRANMAR COMPANY, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: DAVID BARETTA; MARY E. BARETTA; JANG LIM DBA BOB HOAOY STEAKS 2; AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

Law Office of Paul L. Roin By: Paul L. Rein, Esq: Attorneys for Plaintiff QUAIS AMIN Law Offices of Jee Soo Kim By: Joe Soo Kim, Attorneys for Defendant Jang Lin


Joe Soo Kim, Esq. (SBN 165621)

Attorney for Defendant

JANG LIM DBA BOB'S HOAGY STEAKS 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] TO ENLARGE TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Civil L.R. 6-1]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the time within which defendant Jang Lim, dba Bob's Hoagy Steaks 2, may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be, and hereby is, extended to and including October 12.

Law Office of Paul L. Roin

By: Paul L. Rein, Esq:

Attorneys for Plaintiff QUAIS AMIN

Law Offices of Jee Soo Kim

By: Joe Soo Kim, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant

Jang Lin

ORDER

PER THE STIPULATION OF COUNSEL, attached, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The time within which defendant Jang Lim may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be and hereby is, extended to and including October 12, 2011

____

THE HON. JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY


Summaries of

Amin v. Franmar Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
Case No.: C11-04231 JSC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Amin v. Franmar Co.

Case Details

Full title:QUAIS AMIN, Plaintiff, v. FRANMAR COMPANY, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: DAVID…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

Case No.: C11-04231 JSC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)