From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amico v. Pepe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1991
172 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 8, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for an assessment of damages.

The disappearance or intentional unavailability of the defendants is not a reason, in and of itself, to deny a motion to strike the answer where there have been repeated defaults in appearances for examinations before trial (see, Reitte v. Entermy Cab Corp., 162 A.D.2d 259; Moriates v. Powertest Petroleum Co., 114 A.D.2d 888, 889; Foti v. Suero, 97 A.D.2d 748). Mangano, P.J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amico v. Pepe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1991
172 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Amico v. Pepe

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT AMICO, Appellant, v. CARMIN PEPE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Green v. Kolur

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its…

Cavallino v. Sonsky

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Contrary to the appellants'…